Ramsay on Comcast: "We're still talking"

« Kevin Werbach on Tivo | Main | CinemaNow to offer NBC shows for download »

Ramsay on Comcast: "We're still talking"

Insidetivoramsay Last month we posted about a New York Times story that said TiVo walked away from Comcast. USA Today published an interview with Michael Ramsay, ex-CEO and current-Chairman of TiVo, that asked about the Comcast deal reported in the Times.

Q: There've been reports that TiVo was close to striking a licensing deal with Comcast, but you scrapped it.

A: That is totally untrue. I sure as hell am not going to walk away from something that makes sense for the company and its shareholders. That rumor, wherever it came from — and God knows where it came from — is totally fabricated and completely false.

Q: How close did you and Comcast get?

A: Well, we're still talking. We're in discussions with cable companies. We have a variety of offerings for them. These kinds of deals can take months, years to develop because they have great strategic importance for both companies. We're committed to developing those relationships no matter how long they take. If we thought the outcome was futile, we wouldn't be doing it. There's been no pulling back. In fact, it's accelerating.

TiVo's stock has dropped from a 52 week high of $12.94 to $3.63 this morning, due to the loss of DirecTV as a future partner, slow introduction of HDTV and TiVoToGo and most recently the resignation of their President.

Thomas Hawk, who tipped me off to the story, is frustrated with a couple oddities about the timing and the New York Times sourcing.

Well for starters Mike, it is a leading misleading to say "and God knows where it came from" when I damn well hope that you are reading something in a publication as influential as the New York Times about the future of your company. Ok maybe you meant you didn't know where it came from prior to the Times printing it.

If in fact this is not how the deal went down I think this points to a significant credibility problem for the New York Times. The Times published, "Yet, at the last minute, Michael Ramsay, TiVo's chief executive, decided to pull out of the deal. Comcast was not going to pay TiVo enough money or give it enough control over its service, Mr. Ramsay told the company's board, according to people involved in those discussions."

...

However, on a second point, you wait until February 3rd to come out and call the news completely false? I mean yeah the closing price the day before the news of $4.44 a share is not much better than the $3.51 closing price of today but on a percentage basis it's kind of significant.

One of the things that frustrates TiVo fans and investors alike is its inability to effectively communicate. Is this another case of bad PR or is there something else going on?

A deal with Comcast would be huge for TiVo, but TiVo's plan to use the Internet to make an end-run around cable and satellite providers might be a deal breaker for Comcast.

by George Hotelling February 4, 2005 in TiVo

Comments

Q: There've been reports that TiVo was close to striking a licensing deal with Comcast, but you scrapped it.

A: That is totally untrue. I sure as hell am not going to walk away from something that makes sense for the company and its shareholders. That rumor, wherever it came from — and God knows where it came from — is totally fabricated and completely false.

Q: How close did you and Comcast get?

A: Well, we're still talking. We're in discussions with cable companies. We have a variety of offerings for them. These kinds of deals can take months, years to develop because they have great strategic importance for both companies. We're committed to developing those relationships no matter how long they take. If we thought the outcome was futile, we wouldn't be doing it. There's been no pulling back. In fact, it's accelerating.

Thomas Hawk, who tipped me off to the story, is frustrated with a couple oddities about the timing and the New York Times sourcing.

Well for starters Mike, it is a leading misleading to say "and God knows where it came from" when I damn well hope that you are reading something in a publication as influential as the New York Times about the future of your company. Ok maybe you meant you didn't know where it came from prior to the Times printing it.

If in fact this is not how the deal went down I think this points to a significant credibility problem for the New York Times. The Times published, "Yet, at the last minute, Michael Ramsay, TiVo's chief executive, decided to pull out of the deal. Comcast was not going to pay TiVo enough money or give it enough control over its service, Mr. Ramsay told the company's board, according to people involved in those discussions."

...

However, on a second point, you wait until February 3rd to come out and call the news completely false? I mean yeah the closing price the day before the news of $4.44 a share is not much better than the $3.51 closing price of today but on a percentage basis it's kind of significant.

One of the things that frustrates TiVo fans and investors alike is its inability to effectively communicate. Is this another case of bad PR or is there something else going on?

A deal with Comcast would be huge for TiVo, but TiVo's plan to use the Internet to make an end-run around cable and satellite providers might be a deal breaker for Comcast.

Ramsay on Comcast: "We're still talking"

Comments

On this site

Recent Comments