« Consuming RSS on your Tivo | Main | TiVo confirms the obvious, re: The Super Bowl »
The Chicago Tribune has a piece on the impact of DVR/PVR technology and how the business model for TV (advertising) is circumvented by these new technologies.
Television has always been the entertainment medium most immediately sensitive to popular taste. Ratings are provided almost instantly, and the very business model is not to sell the entertainment, but to use the entertainment to gather an audience. The audience is what is sold, to the advertisers.And, as leaders from all aspects of television have warned, when you diminish advertising's effectiveness you mandate that TV has to find a different way to pay for itself.
That means three likely results: the end, or shrinking, of over-the-air free TV to be replaced by much more pay-per-view; more stealth ads sneaked into the content of a show itself, like today's product placement only more so; and, in all likelihood, probably more repeats and a greater ratio of reality schlock to carefully produced scripted fare, because the latter is so expensive to make.
With growing amounts of programming (cable, satellite, etc.) and the lure of video games, Internet games, and the Internet itself, we all are watching less TV. So advertisers must be much more precise with their advertising in order to target the customers who will appreciate/react to their messages. Blaming new technologies for changes in market behavior? Cue the tiny violins, please.
Why more choices may mean fewer [chicagotribune.com]
by Gen Kanai February 1, 2004 in News
TrackBack: http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/459/427849
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference PVRs will diminish TV programming?:
» PVRs and TV Consumption from The Robinson House
PVRs will diminish TV programming? Shouldn't. Personal Video Recorders, like my TiVo, has actually opened up additional markets for advertisers. I rarely had the opportunity to watch neither daytime shows nor late night shows before TiVo. Additionally,... [Read More]
Tracked on Feb 6, 2004 7:39:22 AM